Montana Lawmakers Clash Over Marijuana Tax Windfall: Two New Proposals Emerge After SB 307 Collapse

Legislative Showdown Looms as Competing Plans for Cannabis Revenue Gain Momentum

HELENA — Montana's cannabis cash cow is sparking fresh political battles as two rival proposals for distributing marijuana tax revenue advance through the legislature. This comes just weeks after the dramatic failure of Senate Bill 307, which would have redirected funds from conservation programs to general state coffers.

The Competing Visions

• HB 462 - Championed by Rep. Mike Hopkins, this measure would create a special revenue account for conservation and recreation projects, with 20% dedicated to wildlife habitat restoration.
• HB 551 - Spearheaded by Rep. Josh Kassmier, this proposal would funnel the majority of funds into property tax relief programs, particularly targeting senior citizens and low-income homeowners.

Why This Matters Now

With Montana's marijuana tax revenue exceeding $50 million annually, the stakes couldn't be higher. Industry analysts project this figure could double by 2027 as more dispensaries come online and tourist purchases increase.

1. Conservation groups argue HB 462 honors the original intent of voter-approved marijuana legalization
2. Fiscal conservatives counter that HB 551 provides more direct benefits to struggling Montana families
3. Some lawmakers are floating a potential compromise that would split the difference

The SB 307 Effect

The resounding defeat of last session's controversial bill appears to have reshaped the debate. "Montanans sent a clear message they want these funds used for specific public benefits, not general budget filler," said environmental advocate Sarah Clawson.

What Happens Next?

Both bills must clear the House Appropriations Committee by May 5th to remain viable. Political observers note the outcome may hinge on whether Democratic lawmakers unite behind a single proposal or remain divided.

What Do You Think?

• Should marijuana taxes fund environmental programs or provide direct tax relief?
• Is it fair to use "sin tax" revenue for general budget needs?
• Could diverting funds from conservation hurt Montana's outdoor recreation economy?
• Are lawmakers prioritizing political wins over sound fiscal policy?