Could Montana’s Local Elections Be Moving to Even Years? Lawmakers Weigh In

Montana lawmakers are considering a controversial proposal that could reshape the state’s political landscape. A new bill aims to move municipal elections from odd-numbered years to even-numbered years, aligning them with federal and state elections. Proponents argue this change could boost voter turnout, while critics warn of potential downsides. Here’s what you need to know about this hotly debated issue.

What’s the Proposed Change?

The bill, currently under review, would shift Montana’s local elections—such as city council and mayoral races—to even-numbered years. This would mean voters could cast their ballots for local, state, and federal candidates all at once. Supporters believe this consolidation could simplify the voting process and encourage greater participation.

Why Even Years?

Advocates for the change point to data showing significantly higher voter turnout during even-year elections, which include presidential and congressional races. They argue that aligning local elections with these high-profile contests could:

• Increase voter engagement in municipal races


• Reduce election administration costs


• Make it easier for voters to stay informed about all candidates and issues on the ballot

Opposition to the Bill

Not everyone is on board with the idea. Critics argue that moving local elections to even years could drown out municipal issues amidst the noise of national campaigns. Key concerns include:

• Local candidates may struggle to compete with the media attention and funding of federal races


• Voters might focus solely on national issues, neglecting important local matters


• Potential logistical challenges for election officials

What’s Next?

The bill is still in its early stages, and lawmakers are expected to debate its merits in the coming weeks. If passed, Montana would join a growing number of states experimenting with election timing reforms to boost civic engagement.

What Do You Think?

This proposal has sparked a lively debate among Montanans. Here are some questions to consider:

• Would moving local elections to even years truly increase voter turnout, or would it dilute the importance of municipal issues?


• Should local elections remain separate to ensure they receive the attention they deserve?


• Could this change give an unfair advantage to certain political parties or candidates?


• Is it worth the potential cost savings, or are the risks too great?

What’s your take on this proposal? Should Montana’s local elections move to even years, or is the current system working just fine? Share your thoughts below!