The Scrivner Scandal: One Year Later – Unanswered Questions and Lingering Fallout

A Political Downfall That Rocked Kern County

It's been exactly 365 days since former Kern County Supervisor Zack Scrivner’s dramatic resignation, yet the controversy surrounding his abrupt departure continues to haunt local politics. What began as whispers of misconduct exploded into a full-blown scandal that left voters questioning who they could trust.

What We Know

• The Resignation: Scrivner stepped down abruptly last year following allegations of "inappropriate conduct" with staff members.
• The Investigation: County officials launched an internal probe, but findings were never made public due to confidentiality agreements.
• Legal Silence: No criminal charges were filed, fueling speculation about backroom deals or insufficient evidence.

What We Still Don’t Know

1. Full Details of the Allegations: Were they workplace harassment, misuse of county resources, or something else entirely?
2. Who Initiated the Complaint? The identities of those involved remain shielded from public scrutiny.
3. Why No Transparency? Taxpayers funded the investigation but were denied access to its conclusions.

Where Is Scrivner Now?

Sources claim he has relocated outside Kern County, possibly to Arizona, though attempts to confirm this have been met with radio silence. Meanwhile, his former colleagues refuse to comment, calling it a "closed chapter."

A Warning for Local Government?

This scandal exposed glaring gaps in accountability. Experts argue that without stricter transparency laws, similar incidents could easily happen again.

What Do You Think?

• Should officials involved in misconduct cases be named publicly, even if unproven?
• Is Kern County’s handling of this scandal a cover-up or proper discretion?
• Would you vote for Scrivner again if he ran for office elsewhere?
• Do confidentiality agreements protect victims or shield bad behavior?