Texas Energy Fund to make electrical grid more trusted approved by voters

AUSTIN-- Texans voted on a proposition that would produce moneying to increase "reliability" for Texas' electrical grid in the Nov. 7 constitutional change election.

The Associated Press predicted Texas Proposition 7, which originated from S.J.R. 93, would pass. The proposal would develop the Texas Energy Fund, which would support and finance the "building, upkeep, and modernization of electric generating facilities."

Turnout tracker: How many individuals have enacted the November 2023 election?

Background

Proposition 7 comes after power grid obstacles experienced most especially during winter season storms in the previous years.

Pablo Vegas, president and CEO of ERCOT, stressed the grid has actually become more "unstable" provided the present resources.

Election Results

" The complexities of handling a growing demand, and an extremely dynamic load environment with those kinds of resources becomes more and more tough," Vegas stated Tuesday throughout a conference of the ERCOT board of directors.

Vegas said one solution to get rid of the obstacle is investing in power production that is available on demand, like power plants sustained by gas. Those plants can help throughout times when the requirement for electrical power strains the supply.

" With the death of Proposition 7 on the tally this November, we'll see those incentives integrated to incentivize a more balanced advancement strategy going forward," Vegas told board members.

Why Texas' constitutional amendment elections historically have low voter turnout

Proposal 7 will enact S.B. 2627, which establishes an advisory committee to manage the fund and the different tasks it could be used for. If Proposition 7 passes, $5 billion would be transferred from the General Revenue Fund to the Texas Energy Fund.

Opposition to Proposition 7 comes from the Lone Star chapter of the Sierra Club, an ecological organization based in Austin. Cyrus Reed, conservation director of the Lone Star chapter, said the Texas energy fund is slated to benefit personal energies to develop gas plants using taxpayer's money.

" That fundamentally is putting a risk on taxpayers," Reed said. "What takes place if one of these plants gets built and after that doesn't make enough money?"

Reed emphasized that there are much better options than Proposition 7 to better the current energy system.

" We were big supporters for increasing the quantity of money spent on energy efficiency and need response programs," Reed said. "Programs that in fact help consumers conserve energy in their businesses, homes or homes."

Texans voted on various constitutional amendments, such as Proposition 7, in the Nov. 7 constitutional change election.