Texas Supreme Court's Controversial Ruling: Tarrant GOP's Precinct Chair Position Can Be Filled Amid Legal Chaos

by Emily Wolf, Breaking Now News
September 8, 2024

The Tarrant County Republican Party has been granted the ability to fill a contested precinct chair position while a contentious legal battle unfolds. This decision comes from a stay order issued by the Texas Supreme Court on September 6, 2024.

This ruling pauses a previous emergency injunction and marks a significant moment in a complex and unprecedented struggle over the rights of local political parties versus those of political candidates. The saga began when Chris Rector, a Tarrant County resident, won a primary election to chair Precinct 4230 with a staggering 75% of the vote, only to be deemed ineligible by party Chairman Bo French shortly thereafter.

Background of the Legal Dispute

Chairman French accused Rector of feigning Republican allegiance and subsequently refused to issue a certificate of election. Rector responded by filing a lawsuit, claiming that French fabricated a "bogus, fraudulent claim" regarding his eligibility for the position he had legitimately won.

The legal proceedings have spanned across Tarrant County, extending into Amarillo and Austin. Tony McDonald, the general counsel for the Tarrant County Republican Party, expressed satisfaction with the Supreme Court's ruling, while Rector's attorney, Steve Maxwell, did not provide a comment.

“It is unfortunate that we have been required to take this matter to the Supreme Court,” McDonald stated. “However, we will fight at every level necessary to defend the First Amendment rights of Tarrant County Republicans.”

Ongoing Legal Battles

The initial lawsuit filed by Rector was heard in a Tarrant County court, but as multiple local Republican judges recused themselves, visiting Judge Sydney Hewlett was assigned to the case. After Hewlett denied a motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act, McDonald filed an appeal with the Second Court of Appeals in Fort Worth. However, all seven justices recused themselves, transferring the case to the Seventh Court of Appeals in Amarillo.

Maxwell, representing Rector, requested that the appeals court block the party from filling the precinct chair position pending resolution of the legal matters. The court granted this relief, prompting McDonald to appeal to the Texas Supreme Court, arguing that the relief violated the party's First Amendment rights.

In a surprising turn, Maxwell agreed with McDonald’s claim that the emergency relief granted by the appeals court was unwarranted, suggesting instead that the matter should revert to the original trial court. While the Texas Supreme Court approved a stay on the emergency relief, it has yet to rule on the core petition that would determine if the appeals court can indeed block the party from filling the position.

Looking Ahead: $20,000 Challenge

This North Texas Giving Day, numerous community members are rallying to support local journalism. You can contribute and help unlock additional funds through a limited-time matching challenge!

What’s Next?

As the Supreme Court deliberates, the other case regarding whether Judge Hewlett made an error in denying a motion to dismiss remains active in the Seventh Court of Appeals in Amarillo. The outcomes of these proceedings could have lasting implications for the rights of local political parties throughout Texas.

What do you think?

• Do you believe the Tarrant County Republican Party should have the right to fill the precinct chair position despite ongoing legal disputes?
• What are your thoughts on the implications of this case for local political party rights in Texas?
• Is this a matter of First Amendment rights, or is there more at stake here?
• Should party leadership have the authority to disqualify elected officials based on alleged ineligibility?
• How does this situation reflect broader trends in American politics today?