**Wisconsin Supreme Court Sparks Outrage: Evers’ 400-Year School Funding Veto Stands**

**A Landmark Ruling That Could Reshape Education Funding for Generations**

In a decision that's dividing the state, the Wisconsin Supreme Court narrowly upheld Governor Tony Evers' controversial partial veto—extending a school funding program for a staggering 400 years. The 4-3 ruling has ignited fierce debates over executive power, fiscal responsibility, and the future of public education.

**The Controversial Partial Veto in Question**

Evers used his veto authority to alter a two-year school funding increase passed by the Republican-led legislature, effectively locking in the hike until 2425. Critics argue this move bypasses legislative intent, while supporters claim it ensures long-term stability for struggling school districts.

**Key Arguments from Both Sides**

• For the Veto: Advocates say schools need predictable funding to plan effectively, and this prevents political meddling.


• Against the Veto: Opponents call it an abuse of power, arguing no governor should bind future lawmakers to fiscal decisions.

**What This Means for Wisconsin**

The ruling sets a precedent for how far partial vetoes can stretch, raising concerns about unchecked executive authority. With Wisconsin’s education system already under scrutiny, this decision could fuel further legal and political battles.

**What Do You Think?**

• Should a governor have the power to lock in funding for centuries?


• Is this a win for schools or a dangerous overreach?


• Could this lead to more extreme vetoes in other states?


• Does long-term funding actually help students, or does it remove accountability?

Breaking Now News (BNN)