Iowa's New Hands-Free Law: What Drivers Need to Know Before Hitting the Road

Breaking Now News (BNN) – Iowa State Patrol is gearing up for strict enforcement of the state's new hands-free driving law, set to take effect soon. The legislation, aimed at reducing distracted driving accidents, will prohibit motorists from holding or manually using electronic devices while operating a vehicle.

Key Provisions of the Law

• No handheld devices – Drivers cannot hold a phone or other electronic device while driving.
• Voice-activated or single-touch operation allowed – Hands-free calls and GPS navigation are permitted if initiated without prolonged handling.
• Emergency exceptions – Law permits device use for reporting accidents, crimes, or other emergencies.
• Penalties – Fines start at $100 for first-time offenders, escalating with repeat violations.

How Iowa State Patrol Plans to Enforce It

Troopers will be on high alert for violators, using both traditional traffic stops and advanced monitoring techniques. "This isn’t just about tickets—it’s about saving lives," said a spokesperson from Iowa State Patrol. "Distracted driving is a leading cause of accidents, and this law gives us another tool to keep roads safer."

Tips for Drivers to Stay Compliant

1. Use a mount – Secure your phone to the dashboard or vent for GPS navigation.
2. Enable voice commands – Set up Siri, Google Assistant, or Bluetooth calling.
3. Pull over if necessary – If you must text or make a call, find a safe spot to stop.
4. Educate passengers – Let others in the car handle navigation or communication.

What’s Next?

In the coming weeks, Iowa State Patrol will roll out a public awareness campaign, including highway signage and social media alerts. Drivers should expect a grace period initially, but enforcement will ramp up quickly.

What Do You Think?

• Is a hands-free law enough to stop distracted driving, or should penalties be harsher?
• Should passengers also face fines if they distract the driver?
• Do you think enforcement will disproportionately target certain groups?
• Would better public transit reduce the need for such laws?